There have been times when Conservative leaders have sounded almost sensible outwardly – and different periods where they have sounded animal crackers, yet continued to be cherished by their base. Currently, it's far from that situation. A leading Tory didn't energize the audience when she spoke at her conference, while she presented the red meat of anti-immigration sentiment she believed they wanted.
It’s not so much that they’d all woken up with a fresh awareness of humanity; instead they lacked faith she’d ever be able to deliver it. In practice, fake vegan meat. Conservatives despise that. A veteran Tory apparently called it a “New Orleans funeral”: boisterous, energetic, but nonetheless a farewell.
Certain members are taking a fresh look at one contender, who was a firm rejection at the outset – but as things conclude, and everyone else has departed. Another group is generating a interest around a rising star, a young parliamentarian of the newest members, who looks like a countryside-based politician while saturating her online profiles with anti-migrant content.
Might she become the leader to challenge Reform, now leading the Tories by a substantial lead? Can we describe for overcoming competitors by adopting their policies? Furthermore, if there isn’t, surely we could use an expression from combat sports?
One need not examine America to know this, or consult the scholar's seminal 2017 book, Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy: your entire mental framework is emphasizing it. Centrist right-wing parties is the crucial barrier resisting the far right.
The central argument is that political systems endure by keeping the “propertied and powerful” happy. I have reservations as an organising principle. One gets the impression as though we’ve been catering to the affluent and connected over generations, at the detriment of everyone else, and they never seem sufficiently content to halt efforts to make cuts out of social welfare.
But his analysis is not speculation, it’s an comprehensive document review into the historical German conservative group during the Weimar Republic (along with the British Conservatives in that historical context). As moderate conservatism falters in conviction, when it starts to chase the terminology and symbolic politics of the far right, it cedes the steering wheel.
A key figure cosying up to a controversial strategist was a clear case – but far-right flirtation has become so obvious now as to eliminate competing party narratives. Whatever became of the established party members, who treasure continuity, preservation, governing principles, the national prestige on the world stage?
Why have we lost the progressives, who described the United Kingdom in terms of powerhouses, not powder kegs? Let me emphasize, I didn't particularly support either faction either, but the contrast is dramatic how these ideologies – the broad-church approach, the reformist element – have been erased, in favour of ongoing scapegoating: of migrants, Muslims, welfare recipients and activists.
While discussing issues they reject. They portray protests by older demonstrators as “carnivals of hatred” and employ symbols – union flags, patriotic icons, any item featuring a vibrant national tones – as an direct confrontation to those questioning that being British through and through is the highest ideal a human can aspire to.
There appears to be no any built-in restraint, encouraging reassessment with core principles, their historical context, their stated objectives. Each incentive the political figure offers them, they pursue. Consequently, no, there's no pleasure to observe their collapse. They are pulling democratic norms into the abyss.
A passionate sports journalist with over a decade of experience covering Italian football and local Turin events.